Short-term outcomes of health-related quality of life in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer: multicentre, international, cross-sectional cohort study

Harji, DP; McKigney, N; Koh, C; Solomon, MJ; Griffiths, B; Evans, M; Heriot, A; Sagar, PM; Velikova, G; Brown, JM

Author(s): Harji, DP; McKigney, N; Koh, C; Solomon, MJ; Griffiths, B; Evans, M; Heriot, A; Sagar, PM; Velikova, G; Brown, JM;
Details: Publication Year 2023,Volume 7,Issue #1,Page zrac168
Journal Title: BJS Open
Publication Type: Research article
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Overall survival rates for locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) continue to improve but the evidence concerning health-related quality of life (HrQoL) remains limited. The aim of this study was to describe the short-term HrQoL differences between patients undergoing surgical and palliative treatments for LRRC. METHODS: An international, cross-sectional, observational study was undertaken at five centres across the UK and Australia. HrQoL in LRRC patients was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CR29 and functional assessment of cancer therapy - colorectal (FACT-C) questionnaires and subgroups (curative versus palliative) were compared. Secondary analyses included the comparison of HrQoL according to the margin status, location of disease and type of treatment. Scores were interpreted using minimal clinically important differences (MCID) and Cohen effect size (ES). RESULTS: Out of 350 eligible patients, a total of 95 patients participated, 74.0 (78.0 per cent) treated with curative intent and 21.0 (22.0 per cent) with palliative intent. Median time between LRRC diagnosis and HrQoL assessments was 4 months. Higher overall FACT-C scores denoting better HrQoL were observed in patients undergoing curative treatment, demonstrating a MCID with a mean difference of 18.5 (P < 0.001) and an ES of 0.6. Patients undergoing surgery had higher scores denoting a higher burden of symptoms for the EORTC CR29 domains of urinary frequency (P < 0.001, ES 0.3) and frequency of defaecation (P < 0.001, ES 0.4). Higher overall FACT-C scores were observed in patients who underwent an R0 resection versus an R1 resection (P = 0.051, ES 0.6). EORTC CR29 scores identified worse body image in patients with posterior/central disease (P = 0.021). Patients undergoing palliative chemoradiation reported worse HrQoL scores with a higher symptom burden on the frequency of defaecation scale compared with palliative chemotherapy (P = 0.041). CONCLUSION: Several differences in short-term HrQoL outcomes between patients undergoing curative and palliative treatment for LRRC were documented. Patients undergoing curative surgery reported better overall HrQoL and a higher burden of pelvic symptoms.
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Keywords: Humans; Cross-Sectional Studies; *Quality of Life; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery; *Rectal Neoplasms/surgery; Cohort Studies
Department(s): Surgical Oncology
PubMed ID: 36787174
Publisher's Version: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrac168
Open Access at Publisher's Site: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrac168
Terms of Use/Rights Notice: Refer to copyright notice on published article.

Creation Date: 2023-05-30 07:27:43

Last Modified: 2023-05-30 07:28:52