Implementing structured pathology reporting protocol for non-melanocytic skin cancers: practical considerations
- Author(s)
- Gupta, R; Selinger, CI; Ashford, B; Chua, MST; Clark, JR; Damian, DL; Jackett, LA; James, C; Johnson, S; Ladwa, R; Lambie, D; McKenzie, C; Tan, ST; Scolyer, RA;
- Details
- Publication Year 2023-10,Volume 55,Issue #6,Page 743-759
- Journal Title
- Pathology
- Publication Type
- Editorial
- Abstract
- Non-melanocytic skin cancers (NMSCs) account for five times the incidence of all other cancers combined and cost US $6 billion annually. These are the most frequent specimens encountered in community pathology practice in many Western countries. Lack of standardised structured pathology reporting protocols (SPRPs) can result in omission of critical information or miscommunication leading to suboptimal patient management. The lack of standardised data has significant downstream public health implications, including insufficient data for reliable development of prognostic tools and health-economy planning. The Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia has developed an NMSC SPRP. A multidisciplinary expert committee including pathologists, surgeons, dermatologists, and radiation and medical oncologists from high volume cancer centres was convened. A systematic literature review was performed to identify evidence for including elements as mandatory standards or best practice guidelines. The SPRP and accompanying commentary of evidence, definitions and criteria was peer reviewed by external stakeholders. Finally, the protocol was revised following feedback and trialled in multiple centres prior to implementation. Some parameters utilised clinically for determining management and prognosis including tumour depth, lymphovascular invasion or distance to the margins lack high level evidence in NMSC. Dermatologists, surgeons, and radiation oncologists welcomed the SPRP. Pathologists indicated that the variety of NMSC specimens ranging from curettes to radical resections as well as significant differences in the biological behaviour of different tumours covered by the NMSC umbrella made use of a single protocol difficult. The feedback included that using a SPRP for low risk NMSC was neither clinically justified nor compensated adequately by the Australian Medicare Reimbursement Schedule. Following stakeholder feedback, the SPRP implementation was restricted to excision specimens of head and neck NMSC; and low-risk NMSC, such as superficial basal cell carcinoma, were excluded. Implementing NMSC SPRP fulfils an unmet clinical need. Unlike other cancers, NMSCs generate a range of specimen types and are reported in a wide range of pathology practices. Limiting use of SPRP to NMSC at higher risk of progression and providing formatted templates for easy incorporation into laboratory information systems were essential to successful deployment. In the future, further consideration should be given to implementing the SPRP to include all relevant specimens, including non-head and neck and low-risk NMSC specimens.
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Keywords
- Aged; Humans; Australia; National Health Programs; *Skin Neoplasms/pathology; *Carcinoma, Basal Cell/pathology; Risk; Systematic Reviews as Topic; Basal cell carcinoma; cutaneous; depth of invasion; lymphovascular invasion; macroscopic; margins; microscopic; non-melanocytic skin cancers; perineural invasion; squamous cell carcinoma; structured reporting protocol
- Department(s)
- Radiation Oncology
- PubMed ID
- 37573165
- Publisher's Version
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathol.2023.07.003
- Terms of Use/Rights Notice
- Refer to copyright notice on published article.
Creation Date: 2023-10-19 04:37:34
Last Modified: 2024-07-09 05:30:01