Implementation approaches to improve environmental sustainability in operating theatres: a systematic review
- Author(s)
- Davies, JF; Ikin, B; Francis, JJ; McGain, F;
- Journal Title
- British Journal of Anaesthesia
- Publication Type
- Online publication before print
- Abstract
- Operating theatres consume large amounts of energy and consumables and produce large amounts of waste. There is an increasing evidence base for reducing the climate impacts of healthcare that could be enacted into routine practice; yet, healthcare-associated emissions increase annually. Implementation science aims to improve the systematic uptake of evidence-based care into practice and could, therefore, assist in addressing the environmental impacts of healthcare. The aim of this systematic search with narrative synthesis was to explore what implementation approaches have been applied to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatre activities, described by implementation phases and methodologies. A search was conducted in EMBASE, PubMed, and CINAHL, limited to English and publication since 2010. In total, 3886 articles were retrieved and 11 were included. All were in the exploratory phase (seven of 11) or initial implementation phase (four of 11), but none were in the installation or full implementation phase. Three studies utilised a recognised implementation theory, model, or framework in the design. Four studies used interprofessional education to influence individuals' behaviour to reduce waste, improve waste segregation, or reduce anaesthetic gases. Of those that utilised behaviour change interventions, all were qualitatively successful in achieving environmental improvement. There was an absence of evidence for sustained effects in the intervention studies and little follow-up from studies that explored barriers to innovation. This review demonstrates a gap between evidence for reducing environmental impacts and uptake of proposed practice changes to deliver low-carbon healthcare. Future research into 'greening' healthcare should use implementation research methods to establish a solid implementation evidence base. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL: PROSPERO CRD42022342786.
- Keywords
- climate change; environment; implementation science; knowledge translation; sustainability; waste reduction
- Department(s)
- Health Services Research
- PubMed ID
- 37344341
- Publisher's Version
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2023.05.017
- Terms of Use/Rights Notice
- Refer to copyright notice on published article.
Creation Date: 2023-10-17 03:11:17
Last Modified: 2024-07-09 04:34:51