Radiation therapist research engagement and culture: findings from the ESTRO radiation therapist workshop
- Author(s)
- Tsang, Y; Kivistik, S; Devlin, L; Bali, V; Bennett, E; Dean, J; Dyer, H; Eccles, CL; Marmy, L; Martel, M; Thompson, K; Umbarkar, P; Velec, M; Warren, M; Duffton, A;
- Journal Title
- Technical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
- Publication Type
- Research article
- Abstract
- BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Despite widespread recognition of the value of research among radiation therapists (RTTs), sustained engagement remains low across international settings. This study aimed to explore RTT perspectives on research engagement, characterise the cultural conditions shaping participation, and generate structured recommendations for strengthening RTT research culture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A qualitative, workshop-based study was conducted through the ESTRO RTT workshop series. A sixteen-member Research Engagement Expert Reference Group (RE-ERG), drawn from ten countries, participated in two virtual sessions. The cultural web framework was applied in Workshop 1 to map research culture across six organisational elements. In Workshop 2, participants validated findings and developed recommendations structured around three strategic pillars: Preserve, Adapt, and Innovate (PAI). Real-time polling and recorded transcripts were analysed using deductive thematic analysis informed by the cultural web framework. RESULTS: Two cross-cutting tensions emerged: a persistent recognition-to-practice gap in which strong endorsement of research coexisted with structural barriers to participation, and a reliance on individual commitment rather than systemic support, with research frequently described as "hidden work" conducted outside rostered hours. 15/16 participants (94%) agreed that RTTs could make a significant contribution to research. The Preserve pillar identified five foundational strengths including collaboration, mentorship, visibility, organisational support, and patient-focused research. The Adapt pillar generated recommendations addressing education, governance simplification, career pathway clarity, and protected time. The Innovate pillar emphasised research champion roles, graduated fellowship schemes, digital collaboration platforms, and embedding research within departmental objectives and international networks. CONCLUSION: RTTs collectively articulate a clear and actionable vision for research culture development, yet realising it requires coordinated action from departments, national professional bodies, and international organisations. Applying the cultural web framework alongside the PAI pillars produced practitioner-grounded recommendations that move beyond barrier identification towards infrastructures that make research participation an expected and enabled dimension of RTT professional practice.
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Keywords
- Radiation therapist; research capacity building; research culture
- Department(s)
- Radiation Oncology
- Publisher's Version
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2026.100414
- Open Access at Publisher's Site
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2026.100414- Terms of Use/Rights Notice
- Refer to copyright notice on published article.
Creation Date: 2026-07-02 01:34:29
Last Modified: 2026-07-02 01:34:39