Technology-Enabled (P)rehabilitation for Patients Undergoing Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Author(s)
- Tsoukalas, TR; Bai, Z; Jeon, C; Huynh, R; Gu, E; Alexander, K; Beckenkamp, PR; Boscolo, A; Brown, K; Butow, P; Carey, S; Chen, F; Cummins, M; Dhillon, HM; Dragoje, V; Gorman, K; Halpin, M; Haynes, A; Juraskova, I; Karunaratne, S; Keck, J; Kim, B; Koh, C; Li, Q; Lipton, L; Liu, X; Macedo, J; Mercieca-Bebber, R; Moreton, R; Morton, RL; Redfern, J; Riedel, B; Ritchie, A; Sandroussi, C; Slattery, C; Smith, AB; Solomon, M; Tao, F; White, K; Wilson, K; Wolsley, K; Yu, K; Steffens, D;
- Details
- Publication Year 2026-01-18,Volume 18,Issue #2,Page 296
- Journal Title
- Cancers
- Publication Type
- Review
- Abstract
- Background/Objectives: (P)rehabilitation, comprising structured exercise, nutritional optimisation, and/or psychological support delivered pre- or postoperatively, has demonstrated efficacy in improving outcomes across the cancer care continuum. However, access remains limited. Technology-enabled (p)rehabilitation offers a novel solution with the potential to enhance equity and continuity of care. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of technology-enabled (p)rehabilitation on perioperative and patient-reported outcomes among individuals undergoing thoracic and/or abdominopelvic cancer surgery. Methods: Six databases were search from inception to October 2024. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing technology-enabled (p)rehabilitation with usual care, placebo, or non-technology-based interventions in adults undergoing thoracic and/or abdominopelvic cancer surgery. Outcomes included postoperative complications, hospital readmissions, hospital length of stay (LOS), quality of life (QoL), pain, anxiety, depression, fatigue, distress, and satisfaction. Higher scores indicated improved QoL or worse symptom severity. Risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane tool, and evidence strength was determined using GRADE methodology. Relative risks (RR) and mean differences (MD) were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis. Results: Seventeen RCTs (18 publications, n = 1690) were included. Trials most commonly evaluated application-based platforms (n = 8) and the majority exhibited some risk of bias. Technology-enabled (p)rehabilitation was associated with a significant reduction in LOS (MD = 1.33 days; 95% CI: 0.59-2.07; seven trials), and improvements in pain (MD = 6.12; 95% CI: 3.40-8.84; four trials), depression (MD = 2.82; 95% CI: 0.65-4.99; five trials), fatigue (MD = 10.10; 95% CI: 6.97-13.23; three trials) and distress (MD = 1.23; 95% CI: 0.30-2.16; single trial) compared with controls. Conclusions: Technology-enabled (p)rehabilitation shows promise in reducing LOS and improving selected patient-reported outcomes following thoracic and abdominopelvic cancer surgery. Although evidence is limited due to the small number of studies, modest sample sizes, methodological heterogeneity, and intervention variability, the overall findings justify further investigation. Large-scale, adequately powered clinical trials are required to confirm efficacy and guide clinical effectiveness and implementation studies.
- Publisher
- MDPI
- Keywords
- abdominal surgery; digital health; oncology; patient-reported outcomes; prehabilitation; rehabilitation; thoracic surgery
- Department(s)
- Anaesthetics
- Publisher's Version
- https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18020296
- Open Access at Publisher's Site
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18020296- Terms of Use/Rights Notice
- Refer to copyright notice on published article.
Creation Date: 2026-02-03 06:11:43
Last Modified: 2026-02-03 06:11:50