Readiness and leadership for the implementation of polygenic risk scores: Genetic healthcare providers&#39; perspectives in the hereditary cancer context

Purvis, R; Taylor, N; Young, MA; James, P; Forrest, LE

Readiness and leadership for the implementation of polygenic risk scores: Genetic healthcare providers' perspectives in the hereditary cancer context

Author(s): Purvis, R; Taylor, N; Young, MA; James, P; Forrest, LE;
Details: Publication Year 2025-08,Volume 34,Issue #4,Page e70084
Journal Title: Journal of Genetic Counseling
Publication Type: Research article
Abstract: Genetic healthcare providers and organizations must be made ready for potential future clinical implementation of polygenic risk scores (PRS) for hereditary breast and ovarian (HBOC) cancer risk assessment. Understanding the multi-level factors that contribute to readiness for change will assist leaders with strategic planning and selection of facilitative implementation strategies, ultimately reducing resource wastage and increasing the likelihood of implementation success. Evidence is missing on the current state of readiness in the Australian cancer genomics sector. The aim of this study was to explore genetic healthcare providers' perspectives on organizational readiness and leadership. Participants were recruited through professional networks to complete an online, quantitative survey encompassing multiple validated evidence-based tools. Analyses included descriptive and inferential statistics. Participants (N = 40) were majority female (N = 31, 77.5%) and in clinical roles (N = 31, 77.5%). A high level of personal capability and organizational readiness was found, with current workplace behaviors and culture being enablers for implementation. Barriers to readiness were knowledge of implementation and evaluative processes for PRS and insufficient resourcing. Leaders were confident in their roles and supportive and perseverant behaviors. Participants in non-leadership roles regarded leadership at an average level. Overall, leadership proactivity toward implementation of PRS for HBOC risk assessment was low. If implementation is to be successful, investment in further developing organizational climates conducive to change is required, focusing on interventions to bolster entrepreneurial leadership behaviors and increase implementation competency and resourcing. Further research into readiness and leadership in clinical cancer genetics is needed.
Publisher: Wiley
Keywords: Humans; *Leadership; Female; *Health Personnel/psychology; Male; Adult; Middle Aged; Risk Assessment; Surveys and Questionnaires; Australia; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; *Multifactorial Inheritance; Genetic Risk Score; hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk assessment; implementation; leadership; organizational readiness; polygenic risk scores
Department(s): Familial Cancer Centre
Publisher's Version: https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.70084
Open Access at Publisher's Site: https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.70084
Terms of Use/Rights Notice: Refer to copyright notice on published article.

Creation Date: 2025-08-26 11:57:13

Last Modified: 2025-08-26 11:57:37