Customizing workflows for electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) symptom monitoring using the action, actor, context, target, time (AACTT) framework
Journal Title
Quality of Life Research
Publication Type
Online publication before print
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Real-time electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) symptom monitoring is a complex intervention with few examples of successful implementation at scale. A key challenge is designing a clear ePRO symptom monitoring workflow to support implementation into practice. We aimed to create an empirical and theory-informed site-specific workflow guided by the Action, Actor, Context, Target, Time (AACTT) implementation science framework. METHODS: A five-step process was undertaken to customize a generic ePRO symptom monitoring workflow to create a site-specific version: (1) design a generic ePRO symptom monitoring workflow through a qualitative study with key stakeholders; (2) conduct co-design workshops to understand stakeholder preferences regarding a site-specific version; (3) code co-design workshop data using the AACTT framework to produce a provisional site-specific version; (4) conduct a final co-design workshop using the AACTT framework to finalize stakeholder preferences for a site-specific version; and (5) code co-design workshop data using the AACTT framework to produce a final site-specific version. RESULTS: Participants (n = 27) included nine patients, four caregivers, four oncologists, four nurses, two pharmacists, two clinic administrators, and two Electronic Medical Record (EMR) analysts. Provisional and final site-specific workflows were generated outlining the key AACTT components for each step of ePRO symptom monitoring. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the value in using the AACTT to guide the co-design of a site-specific workflow for ePRO symptom monitoring. By describing this process in detail, we will enable others to replicate this process for creating site-specific workflows not only for ePRO symptom monitoring, but for any complex clinical process.
Keywords
AACTT framework; Implementation science; Patient-reported outcomes; Symptom monitoring; Workflows
Department(s)
Medical Oncology; Health Services Research; Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre; Digital and Healthcare Innovation
Open Access at Publisher's Site
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-025-03995-y
Terms of Use/Rights Notice
Refer to copyright notice on published article.


Creation Date: 2025-06-26 04:30:30
Last Modified: 2025-06-26 04:31:07

© 2025 The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research. Access to this website is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use

An error has occurred. This application may no longer respond until reloaded. Reload 🗙