Development, Validation, and Valuation of a Head and Neck Cancer-Specific Health Utility Instrument (HNC-8D): A Head and Neck Cancer International Group Collaborative Study
- Author(s)
- de Almeida, JR; Su, J; AlShenaiber, A; Noroozi, H; Buttner, M; Goldstein, DP; Hansen, A; Kowalski, LP; Licitra, L; Mehanna, H; Noel, CW; Parmar, A; Porceddu, S; Ringash, J; Rogers, S; Dos Santos, MA; Simon, C; Truong, MT; Xu, W;
- Journal Title
- JAMA Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery
- Publication Type
- Online publication before print
- Abstract
- IMPORTANCE: Generic health utility instruments lack the discriminative ability to differentiate among health states in patients after head and neck cancer treatment. OBJECTIVE: To develop, validate, and valuate a head and neck cancer-specific health utility measure. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This psychometric study comprised 2 phases to develop and validate a health utility instrument. The first phase, development and validation, occurred from January 2021 to August 2022. An expert panel selected disease-specific quality-of-life instruments as the basis for a new utility instrument. Two datasets (n = 458 and 493) were used to establish dimension structure through exploratory factor analysis, and to select items using Rasch and psychometric criteria and expert opinion. Discriminative validity of the new instrument was tested by comparing scores for different disease severities (patients with and without gastrostomy and tracheostomy tubes). The second phase, valuation, was conducted from January 2023 to January 2024 in a quaternary referral center with healthy participants. Participants completed time-trade-off exercises for 100 sampled health states and were randomized to discovery and validation sets (80:20). Using a repeated measures model, a scoring algorithm to predict utilities of health states within the instrument was created in the discovery set and tested in both sets. Data were analyzed from January 2022 to December 2023. INTERVENTION: Participants performed time-trade-off exercises for various states. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Discriminative validity (first phase) and the mean absolute differences of predicted and observed utilities (second phase). RESULTS: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer's Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 and its Head and Neck module 43 were selected by the expert panel and used as the basis instruments. Exploratory factor analysis established 8 dimensions, with 1 item selected per dimension. Of the 488 respondents, 84 with gastrostomy and/or tracheostomy tubes reported lower scores for 7 of the 8 items. In the second phase, 2497 valuations were performed by 250 healthy participants (mean [SD] age, 42.4 [16.5] years; 166 [66%] females). The scoring algorithm produced mean absolute differences between predicted and observed utilities of 0.041 (95% CI, 0.034-0.047) and 0.082 (95% CI, 0.065-0.100) in the discovery and validation sets, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This psychometric study developed a new head and neck cancer-specific utility measure, the HNC-8D (Head and Neck Cancer-8 Dimensions). The instrument demonstrated predictive accuracy for measuring health utility and can be used to differentiate health utility states following head and neck cancer treatment.
- Department(s)
- Radiation Oncology
- Publisher's Version
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2025.0160
- Terms of Use/Rights Notice
- Refer to copyright notice on published article.
Creation Date: 2025-05-08 07:28:34
Last Modified: 2025-05-08 07:28:46