Identifying strategies for implementing a clinical guideline for cancer-related fatigue: a qualitative study

Pearson, EJ; Denehy, L; Edbrooke, L

Author(s): Pearson, EJ; Denehy, L; Edbrooke, L;
Details: Publication Year 2023-04-24,Volume 23,Issue #1,Page 395
Journal Title: BMC Health Services Research
Publication Type: Research article
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines assist health professionals' (HPs) decisions. Costly to develop, many guidelines are not implemented in clinical settings. This paper describes an evaluation of contextual factors to inform clinical guideline implementation strategies for the common and distressing problem of cancer-related fatigue (CRF) at an Australian cancer hospital. METHODS: A qualitative inquiry involving interviews and focus groups with consumers and multidisciplinary HPs explored key Canadian CRF guideline recommendations. Four HP focus groups examined the feasibility of a specific recommendation, while a consumer focus group examined experiences and preferences for managing CRF. Audio recordings were analysed using a rapid method of content analysis designed to accelerate implementation research. Strategies for implementation were guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. RESULTS: Five consumers and 31 multidisciplinary HPs participated in eight interviews and five focus groups. Key HP barriers to fatigue management were insufficient knowledge and time; and lack of accessible screening and management tools or referral pathways. Consumer barriers included priority for cancer control during short health consultations, limited stamina for extended or extra visits addressing fatigue, and HP attitudes towards fatigue. Enablers of optimal fatigue management were alignment with existing healthcare practices, increased HP knowledge of CRF guidelines and tools, and improved referral pathways. Consumers valued their HPs addressing fatigue as part of treatment, with a personal fatigue prevention or management plan including self-monitoring. Consumers preferred fatigue management outside clinic appointments and use of telehealth consultations. CONCLUSIONS: Strategies that reduce barriers and leverage enablers to guideline use should be trialled. Approaches should include (1) accessible knowledge and practice resources for busy HPs, (2) time efficient processes for patients and their HPs and (3) alignment of processes with existing practice. Funding for cancer care must enable best practice supportive care.
Publisher: BioMed Central
Keywords: Humans; Australia; Canada; Qualitative Research; Focus Groups; *Neoplasms; Fatigue; Barriers; Cfir; Consumer; Education; Facilitators; Guideline; Health professional; Implementation
Department(s): Health Services Research
PubMed ID: 37095506
Publisher's Version: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09377-9
Open Access at Publisher's Site: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09377-9
Terms of Use/Rights Notice: Refer to copyright notice on published article.

Creation Date: 2023-08-03 07:58:30

Last Modified: 2023-08-03 08:01:33