Effectiveness of Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Spasticity Management in Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review

Amatya, B; Khan, F; Song, K; Galea, M

Author(s): Amatya, B; Khan, F; Song, K; Galea, M;
Details: Publication Year 2024-10,Volume 48,Issue #5,Page 305-343
Journal Title: Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine
Publication Type: Review
Abstract: This systematic review aims to determine the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions for the management of spasticity in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). A comprehensive literature search in health science databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINHAL) was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (up to April 2024). Manual searching in journals and screening of the reference lists of identified studies were conducted. Two authors independently selected the studies, assessed the methodological quality, and summarized the evidence. A meta-analysis was not feasible due to the methodological, clinical, and statistical diversity of the included studies. Overall, 32 RCTs (n=1,481 participants) investigated various types of non-pharmacological interventions including: physical activity, transcranial magnetic stimulation (intermittent theta burst stimulation [iTBS], repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation [rTMS]), electromagnetic therapy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, vibration therapy, shock wave therapy, self-management educational programs, and acupuncture. All studies scored 'low' on the methodological quality assessment, implying a high risk of bias. The findings suggest 'moderate to low certainty' evidence for physical activity programs used in isolation or combination with other interventions (pharmacological or non-pharmacological), and for iTBS/rTMS with or without adjuvant exercise therapy in improving spasticity in adults with MS. There is 'very low certainty' evidence supporting the use of other modalities for treating spasticity in this population. Despite a wide range of non-pharmacological interventions used for the management of spasticity in pwMS, there is a lack of conclusive evidence for many. More robust trials with larger sample sizes and longer-term follow-ups are needed to build evidence for these interventions.
Keywords: Multiple sclerosis; Muscle spasticity; Rehabilitation; Systematic review
Department(s): Clinical Services
Publisher's Version: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.240064
Open Access at Publisher's Site: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.240064
Terms of Use/Rights Notice: Refer to copyright notice on published article.

Creation Date: 2024-11-26 06:49:05

Last Modified: 2024-11-26 06:50:57