The Clinical and Psychosocial Outcomes for Women Who Received Unexpected Clinically Actionable Germline Information Identified through Research: An Exploratory Sequential Mixed-Methods Comparative Study
- Author(s)
- Forrest, LE; Forbes Shepherd, R; Tutty, E; Pearce, A; Campbell, I; Devereux, L; Trainer, AH; James, PA; Young, MA;
- Details
- Publication Year 2022-07-07,Volume 12,Issue #7,Page 1112
- Journal Title
- Journal of Personalized Medicine
- Publication Type
- Research article
- Abstract
- Background Research identifying and returning clinically actionable germline variants offer a new avenue of access to genetic information. The psychosocial and clinical outcomes for women who have received this 'genome-first care' delivering hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk information outside of clinical genetics services are unknown. Methods: An exploratory sequential mixed-methods case-control study compared outcomes between women who did (cases; group 1) and did not (controls; group 2) receive clinically actionable genetic information from a research cohort in Victoria, Australia. Participants completed an online survey examining cancer risk perception and worry, and group 1 also completed distress and adaptation measures. Group 1 participants subsequently completed a semi structured interview. Results: Forty-five participants (group 1) and 96 (group 2) completed the online survey, and 31 group 1 participants were interviewed. There were no demographic differences between groups 1 and 2, although more of group 1 participants had children (p = 0.03). Group 1 reported significantly higher breast cancer risk perception (p < 0.001) compared to group 2, and higher cancer worry than group 2 (p < 0.001). Some group 1 participants described how receiving their genetic information heightened their cancer risk perception and exacerbated their cancer worry while waiting for risk-reducing surgery. Group 1 participants reported a MICRA mean score of 27.4 (SD 11.8, range 9-56; possible range 0-95), and an adaptation score of 2.9 (SD = 1.1). Conclusion: There were no adverse psychological outcomes amongst women who received clinically actionable germline information through a model of 'genome-first' care compared to those who did not. These findings support the return of clinically actionable research results to research participants.
- Keywords
- clinical outcomes; clinically actionable genetic information; mixed-methods; psychosocial outcomes; returning research results
- Department(s)
- Familial Cancer Centre; Laboratory Research
- PubMed ID
- 35887609
- Publisher's Version
- https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12071112
- Open Access at Publisher's Site
https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12071112- Terms of Use/Rights Notice
- Refer to copyright notice on published article.
Creation Date: 2024-10-25 06:46:33
Last Modified: 2024-10-25 06:48:14