Implementing a standardised perioperative nutrition care pathway in upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery: a mixed-methods analysis of implementation using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
- Author(s)
- Deftereos, I; Hitch, D; Butzkueven, S; Carter, V; Fetterplace, K; Fox, K; Ottaway, A; Pierce, K; Steer, B; Varghese, J; Kiss, N; Yeung, JM;
- Journal Title
- BMC Health Services Research
- Publication Type
- Research article
- Abstract
- BACKGROUND: Implementation studies of complex interventions such as nutrition care pathways are important to health services research, as they support translation of research into practice. There is limited research regarding implementation of a nutrition care pathway in an upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancer population. The aim of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the implementation process of a perioperative nutrition care pathway in UGI cancer surgery using The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). METHODS: This was a mixed methods implementation study conducted during a pilot study of a standardised nutrition care pathway across four major hospitals between September 2018 to August 2019. Outcome measures included five focus groups among study dietitians (n = 4-8 per group), and quantitative satisfaction surveys from multi-disciplinary team (MDT) members (n = 14) and patients (n = 18). Focus group responses were analysed thematically using the CFIR constructs, which were used as a priori codes. Survey responses were summarised using means and standard deviations. A convergent parallel mixed methods approach according to CFIR domains and constructs was used to integrate qualitative and quantitative data. RESULTS: Qualitative data demonstrated that dietitian perceptions primarily aligned with five CFIR constructs (networks and communications, structural characteristics, adaptability, compatibility and patient needs/resources), indicating a complex clinical and implementation environment. Challenges to implementation mostly related to adapting the pathway, and the compatibility of nutrition coordination to existing aspects of care within each setting. Identified benefits from dietitian qualitative data and MDT survey responses included increased engagement between the dietitian and MDT, and a more proactive approach to nutrition care. Patients were highly satisfied with the service, with the majority of survey items being rated highly (>/=4 of a possible 5 points). CONCLUSIONS: The nutrition care pathway was perceived to be beneficial by key stakeholders. Based on the findings, sustainability and compliance to this model of care may be achieved with improved systems level coordination and communication.
- Keywords
- Critical Pathways; Focus Groups; Humans; *Neoplasms; *Nutrition Therapy; Pilot Projects; Dietitian; Gastrointestinal cancer; Multidisciplinary team; Nutrition care pathway; Nutrition support; Qualitative
- Department(s)
- Nutrition and Speech Pathology
- PubMed ID
- 35209897
- Publisher's Version
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07466-9
- Open Access at Publisher's Site
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07466-9- Terms of Use/Rights Notice
- Refer to copyright notice on published article.
Creation Date: 2024-10-23 06:31:23
Last Modified: 2024-10-23 06:33:16