Cues Disseminated by Professional Associations That Represent 5 Health Care Professions Across 5 Nations: Lexical Analysis of Tweets
- Author(s)
- Dadich, A; Wells, R; Williams, SJ; Taskin, N; Coskun, M; Grenier, C; Ponsignon, F; Scahill, S; Best, S;
- Journal Title
- Journal of Medical Internet Research
- Publication Type
- Research article
- Abstract
- BACKGROUND: Collaboration across health care professions is critical in efficiently and effectively managing complex and chronic health conditions, yet interprofessional care does not happen automatically. Professional associations have a key role in setting a profession's agenda, maintaining professional identity, and establishing priorities. The associations' external communication is commonly undertaken through social media platforms, such as Twitter. Despite the valuable insights potentially available into professional associations through such communication, to date, their messaging has not been examined. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify the cues disseminated by professional associations that represent 5 health care professions spanning 5 nations. METHODS: Using a back-iterative application programming interface methodology, public tweets were sourced from professional associations that represent 5 health care professions that have key roles in community-based health care: general practice, nursing, pharmacy, physiotherapy, and social work. Furthermore, the professional associations spanned Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States. A lexical analysis was conducted of the tweets using Leximancer (Leximancer Pty Ltd) to clarify relationships within the discourse. RESULTS: After completing a lexical analysis of 50,638 tweets, 7 key findings were identified. First, the discourse was largely devoid of references to interprofessional care. Second, there was no explicit discourse pertaining to physiotherapists. Third, although all the professions represented in this study support patients, discourse pertaining to general practitioners was most likely to be connected with that pertaining to patients. Fourth, tweets pertaining to pharmacists were most likely to be connected with discourse pertaining to latest and research. Fifth, tweets about social workers were unlikely to be connected with discourse pertaining to health or care. Sixth, notwithstanding a few exceptions, the findings across the different nations were generally similar, suggesting their generality. Seventh and last, tweets pertaining to physiotherapists were most likely to refer to discourse pertaining to profession. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that health care professional associations do not use Twitter to disseminate cues that reinforce the importance of interprofessional care. Instead, they largely use this platform to emphasize what they individually deem to be important and advance the interests of their respective professions. Therefore, there is considerable opportunity for professional associations to assert how the profession they represent complements other health care professions and how the professionals they represent can enact interprofessional care for the benefit of patients and carers.
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications
- Keywords
- Humans; United States; *Cues; Communication; Canada; Pharmacists; *Social Media; Delivery of Health Care; collaboration; knowledge translation; professional associations; professional identity; social media
- Department(s)
- Health Services Research
- PubMed ID
- 36920443
- Publisher's Version
- https://doi.org/10.2196/42927
- Open Access at Publisher's Site
https://doi.org/10.2196/42927- Terms of Use/Rights Notice
- Refer to copyright notice on published article.
Creation Date: 2023-06-22 07:56:52
Last Modified: 2023-06-22 07:57:28