Developing a shared language: a proposed guide to frame early implementation science collaboration discussions
Journal Title
Translational Behavioral Medicine
Publication Type
Online publication before print
Abstract
Miscommunication between health care practitioners and implementation researchers can lead to a mismatch of expectations and understandings, resulting in wasted research and frustration. Conversely, combining the expertise and knowledge of those working in health care practice and implementation research can deliver context informed research questions and appropriate study designs. Achieving this ambition requires a shared language. We sought to develop a guide to identify a common language to constructively explore nascent implementation research concepts. We set up a working group, comprising of implementation researchers, health care practitioners and operational managers, to work through ideas generation, debate and a consensus process to generate and refine a discussion guide. The resultant guide steps health care practitioners and implementation researchers through a three-phase enquiry - Question 1: What is the implementation question? Question 2: What is the proposed implementation solution? And Question 3: How can the investigation of this idea be resourced? At each step, the health care practitioner and implementation researcher collaborate to include theory and practice and rigorously work through the question to build implementation on evidence and to promote diverse stakeholder engagement. The next steps for this study will be operationalising the discussion guide, as an interactive tool. Future evaluation, to test effectiveness, acceptability and feasibility will be designed with health care practitioners and implementation researchers.; Bringing together a wide range of clinical and research experts is vital for meeting the challenges of implementing of complex health interventions. However, language and jargon can often get in the way. This mismatch can lead to missed opportunities and contribute to wasted research that fails to meet consumers’ needs. We need a shared language to maximize the expertise of healthcare practitioners and implementation researchers, thereby improving care. We propose a three-phase discussion guide to assist healthcare practitioners and implementation researchers through the process of starting an implementation study. We guide them through three questions: What is the implementation question? What is the proposed implementation solution? How can this study be resourced? At each step, healthcare practitioners and implementation researchers collaborate to incorporate theory and practice, rigorously addressing the question to build implementation based on evidence and promote diverse stakeholder engagement.; eng
Keywords
collaboration; health care practitioner; implementation science; shared language
Department(s)
Health Services Research
Terms of Use/Rights Notice
Refer to copyright notice on published article.


Creation Date: 2024-09-26 03:27:22
Last Modified: 2024-09-26 03:32:37

© 2024 The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research. Access to this website is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use

An error has occurred. This application may no longer respond until reloaded. Reload 🗙