Qualitative evaluation of a multidisciplinary master of cancer sciences: impacts on graduates and influencing curricular factors
- Author(s)
- Lai-Kwon, J; Woodward-Kron, R; Seignior, D; Allen, L; McArthur, G; Barrett, M; Kok, DL;
- Details
- Publication Year 2024-07-08,Volume 24,Issue #1,Page 734
- Journal Title
- BMC Medical Education
- Publication Type
- Research article
- Abstract
- BACKGROUND: Evaluations of continuing professional development programs typically focus on short-term knowledge and skill acquisition. There is a need for more comprehensive program evaluation methods that assess a broader range of impacts and can elicit how and why these outcomes occurred. We conducted a qualitative study to investigate the impacts of a multidisciplinary, online health professional postgraduate degree and to gain insights into the factors that led to these impacts. METHODS: Participants were graduates of the University of Melbourne's Master of Cancer Sciences who could participate in an online interview. Semi-structured, qualitative interviews were conducted exploring a broad range of impacts, including changes in professional practice and career trajectory since graduation, and how the degree influenced these impacts. Data were analysed inductively. RESULTS: Fifteen participants (female: 80%, 31-50 years old: 67%) from a range of professions were interviewed. A number of major themes were uncovered. Impacts on career trajectory included expanded career horizons (e.g. increased role diversity and complexity), and increased confidence in their professional identity. Impacts on professional practice included individual improvements in patient care and research, as well as changes in organisational practice. Factors identified as leading to these impacts were: (i) active, interactive and interprofessional learning; (ii) networking, informal mentoring, and role-modelling; and (iii) support at multiple levels. CONCLUSION: This study provides preliminary evidence of the positive impact of a Master of Cancer Sciences on graduate career trajectory and professional practice. In addition, the inductive methodology enabled identification of the curricular features (both planned and emergent) that influenced these impacts, facilitating potential transferability of learnings to other teaching programs.
- Publisher
- BioMed Central
- Keywords
- Humans; Female; Male; *Qualitative Research; Adult; *Curriculum; Middle Aged; Program Evaluation; Education, Medical, Graduate; Interviews as Topic; Cancer education; Continuing professional development; Healthcare professional education; Interprofessional learning; Medical education; Oncology; Online education; Postgraduate education
- Department(s)
- Medical Oncology
- Publisher's Version
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05744-0
- Open Access at Publisher's Site
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05744-0- Terms of Use/Rights Notice
- Refer to copyright notice on published article.
Creation Date: 2024-08-06 05:29:17
Last Modified: 2024-08-06 05:31:19