Proton versus photon therapy for high-risk prostate cancer with dose escalation of dominant intraprostatic lesions: a preliminary planning study
- Author(s)
- Ong, ALK; Knight, K; Panettieri, V; Dimmock, M; Tuan, JKL; Tan, HQ; Wright, C;
- Journal Title
- Frontiers in Oncology
- Publication Type
- Research article
- Abstract
- BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of safe-dose escalation to dominant intraprostatic lesions (DILs) and assess the clinical impact using dose-volume (DV) and biological metrics in photon and proton therapy. Biological parameters defined as late grade ≥ 2 gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) derived from planned (D (P)) and accumulated dose (D (A)) were utilized. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 10 patients with high-risk prostate cancer with multiparametric MRI-defined DILs were investigated. Each patient had two plans with a focal boost to the DILs using intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Plans were optimized to obtain DIL coverage while respecting the mandatory organ-at-risk constraints. For the planning evaluation, DV metrics, tumor control probability (TCP) for the DILs and whole prostate excluding the DILs (prostate-DILs), and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for the rectum and bladder were calculated. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for analyzing TCP and NTCP data. RESULTS: IMPT achieved a higher Dmean for the DILs compared to VMAT (IMPT: 68.1 GyRBE vs. VMAT: 66.6 Gy, p < 0.05). Intermediate-high rectal and bladder doses were lower for IMPT (p < 0.05), while the high-dose region (V60 Gy) remained comparable. IMPT-TCP for prostate-DIL were higher compared to VMAT (IMPT: 86%; α/β = 3, 94.3%; α/β = 1.5 vs. VMAT: 84.7%; α/β = 3, 93.9%; α/β = 1.5, p < 0.05). Likewise, IMPT obtained a moderately higher DIL TCP (IMPT: 97%; α/β = 3, 99.3%; α/β = 1.5 vs. VMAT: 95.9%; α/β = 3, 98.9%; α/β = 1.5, p < 0.05). Rectal D (A)-NTCP displayed the highest GI toxicity risk at 5.6%, and IMPT has a lower GI toxicity risk compared to VMAT-predicted Quantec-NTCP (p < 0.05). Bladder D (P)-NTCP projected a higher GU toxicity than D (A)-NTCP, with VMAT having the highest risk (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Dose escalation using IMPT is able to achieve a high TCP for the DILs, with the lowest rectal and bladder DV doses at the intermediate-high-dose range. The reduction in physical dose was translated into a lower NTCP (p < 0.05) for the bladder, although rectal toxicity remained equivalent.
- Keywords
- biological modeling; high-risk prostate cancer; intraprostatic lesions; magnetic resonance imaging; proton therapy
- Department(s)
- Physical Sciences
- Publisher's Version
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1241711
- Open Access at Publisher's Site
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1241711- Terms of Use/Rights Notice
- Refer to copyright notice on published article.
Creation Date: 2023-12-22 03:50:49
Last Modified: 2023-12-22 03:54:42